1/26/13 2013 MARCH 4 LIFE HIGHLIGHT STRENGTH OF "LIFERS" VERSUS LIBERAL MEDIA TRYING TO PRETEND WE DON'T EXIST and/or CHANGE OUR NAME:
"...March for Life, on Friday, Jan. 25 , marks the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. It also highlights how far the media will go to avoid using anything positive to describe people opposed to baby killing. Marchers get called "opponents" and "anti-abortion activists," not "pro-life." The march showcases the strength of the pro-life cause despite the media's ongoing support of abortion. It's an event
where hundreds of thousands show up each year to protest in support of life that thousands of journalists either ignore or denigrate. It's so overt that The New York Times has ignored the march five years running (or walking in this case) in its print
edition. And the network news shows are so put off by the concept of pro-life anything that they've only said the word "life" twice in the last 10 years when referencing either the march or the Roe v. Wade anniversary. That's twice in 22
stories. A recent interview by NBC's Andrea Mitchell illustrated the
"life" language prejudice pervading broadcast media. When Republican strategist Juleanna Glover identified herself as "deeply pro-life" in an interview, Mitchell interrupted, "Well, what I would call anti-abortion," and added, "to use the term
that I think is more value neutral."
That's the American media for you – killing children needs to be "value neutral."
The Associated Press is responsible for some of this problem, institutionalizing the bias with its famous style manual. Journalists should "Use anti-abortion
instead of pro-life and abortion rights instead of pro-abortion or pro-choice," according to The Associated
Press (AP) Stylebook's 44 th edition.
The Washington Post and The New York Times both went to ridiculous lengths to make this point. Rather than introducing
interviewee Richard Doerflinger by his real title, both papers called him "Associate Director of Anti-Abortion
Activities for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops." His proper title was "Associate Director of Pro-Life Activities."
George Orwell clearly envisioned the future abortion debate. There's a reason for all this. Journalists are overwhelmingly
pro-abortion, just as predictable as the Hollywood left, in fact. Two of the shrill voices on "The View" showed the similarity during a Feb. 8, 2012, discussion. A ruling that required an ultrasound before having an abortion sent the "View" ladies into an uproar...."
READ FULL STORY AT
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/25/march-for-life-shows-media-march-in-lockstep-with-pro-abortion-groups/
**** "But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light." 1 Peter 2:9 "Ngunit ikaw ay isang pinili na mga tao, isang hari o reyna pari, isang banal na bansa, ng mga taong kabilang sa Diyos, na maaari mong ipinapahayag ang papuri sa kanya na tinatawag na out ka ng kadiliman sa kanyang kahanga-hangang liwanag." 1 Pedro 2:09"En þú ert útvaldir, konunglegt prestafélag, heilög þjóð, þjóð sem tilheyra Guði, sem þú getur lýst því yfir að lof af honum, sem kallaði yður frá myrkrinu til dásamlegt ljós hans." 1 Peter 2:09
Posted by VanderKOK
*ProtectUnbornLife
*Fight4Kindness
*Pray4Chapels in the PublicSchools
www.KeepTheFaithbyVanderKok.blogspot.com
www.Twitter.com/StanTheBigMan
*Listen to God @
www.HearingtheWord.posterous.com
*******
